Back to database
2/5 Weak evidence

Fat loss evidence brief

Green coffee extract

May modestly affect weight or cardiometabolic markers in some trials, but the evidence is not strong enough for a gym fat-loss recommendation.

Small uncertain weight signal health 5 linked sources Content audit 2026-05-04

Headline Finding

Meta-analyses report modest anthropometric effects, but study quality and durability limit practical confidence.

Dose Context

Chlorogenic acid content, caffeine content, and extract quality vary; older weight-loss claims relied on limited or methodologically weak data.

Important Caveat

The body-weight signal is weak and does not support fat-burner positioning.

Source Drawer

Linked Research

5 papers and evidence links - audit 2026-05-04
  1. Meta-analysis Anthropometric dose-response meta-analysis
  2. Meta-analysis Obesity umbrella review
  3. Meta-analysis Cardiovascular risk meta-analysis
  4. Meta-analysis Older weight-loss meta-analysis
  5. Safety Long-term safety/body-weight review PDF

How To Read This Rating

The score reflects evidence that the supplement does its stated job. Some jobs are direct, such as strength, endurance, or recovery; others are indirect, such as sleep, mood, appetite, or health support. A real effect can still receive a cautious practical rating when dose, safety, product quality, or audience fit remain uncertain.

Spot An Evidence Issue?

Send the disputed claim, source link, and why it changes the practical verdict. Corrections that materially affect the claim, dose, caveat, or rating are prioritized.

Report a source or rating issue